loess cohesion Search Results


90
Geometrics Inc loess cohesion
Loess Cohesion, supplied by Geometrics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/loess cohesion/product/Geometrics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
loess cohesion - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Allergan allergan natrelle 410
Implants Measured for Form Stability, Gel Material Properties, and Shell Thickness
Allergan Natrelle 410, supplied by Allergan, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/allergan natrelle 410/product/Allergan
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
allergan natrelle 410 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Implants Measured for Form Stability, Gel Material Properties, and Shell Thickness

Journal: Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Article Title: Physical Properties of Silicone Gel Breast Implants

doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy103

Figure Lengend Snippet: Implants Measured for Form Stability, Gel Material Properties, and Shell Thickness

Article Snippet: The rank order from highest to lowest gel cohesivity was Allergan Natrelle 410 and Inspira implant containing TruForm 3 gel, followed by Mentor textured shaped implant containing Cohesive III gel, Sientra implant containing High-Strength Cohesive-Plus gel, and Motiva implant containing ProgressiveGel Plus.

Techniques:

Form stability of textured shaped breast implants. (A) Mean per cent retention of dimensions; 100% indicates no change in dimensions when implant is moved from the horizontal to vertical orientation. * P < 0.05 for comparisons between Allergan Natrelle 410 vs Mentor MemoryShape and Sientra Textured Shaped implants. (B) Net per cent change in dimensions when the breast implant was moved from a horizontal to a vertical supported orientation. When the implant moves from horizontal to vertical, height will decrease but lower pole and projection will increase giving a value >100% for retention for lower pole/projection. (C) Change in upper pole depth measurements when the implant was moved from a horizontal to a vertical supported orientation.

Journal: Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Article Title: Physical Properties of Silicone Gel Breast Implants

doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy103

Figure Lengend Snippet: Form stability of textured shaped breast implants. (A) Mean per cent retention of dimensions; 100% indicates no change in dimensions when implant is moved from the horizontal to vertical orientation. * P < 0.05 for comparisons between Allergan Natrelle 410 vs Mentor MemoryShape and Sientra Textured Shaped implants. (B) Net per cent change in dimensions when the breast implant was moved from a horizontal to a vertical supported orientation. When the implant moves from horizontal to vertical, height will decrease but lower pole and projection will increase giving a value >100% for retention for lower pole/projection. (C) Change in upper pole depth measurements when the implant was moved from a horizontal to a vertical supported orientation.

Article Snippet: The rank order from highest to lowest gel cohesivity was Allergan Natrelle 410 and Inspira implant containing TruForm 3 gel, followed by Mentor textured shaped implant containing Cohesive III gel, Sientra implant containing High-Strength Cohesive-Plus gel, and Motiva implant containing ProgressiveGel Plus.

Techniques:

Gel material properties of round and textured shaped breast implants: mean gel cohesivity (A), resistance to gel deformation (B), and energy absorption (C). Textured shaped implants are Allergan Natrelle 410, Mentor Cohesive III, and Sientra High-Strength Cohesive Plus (250MP). Values that do not share a letter are significantly different ( P < 0.05). Error bars represent the standard deviation. *355MP. † 250MP. HSC, high-strength cohesive; Prog., progressive; TF, TruForm.

Journal: Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Article Title: Physical Properties of Silicone Gel Breast Implants

doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy103

Figure Lengend Snippet: Gel material properties of round and textured shaped breast implants: mean gel cohesivity (A), resistance to gel deformation (B), and energy absorption (C). Textured shaped implants are Allergan Natrelle 410, Mentor Cohesive III, and Sientra High-Strength Cohesive Plus (250MP). Values that do not share a letter are significantly different ( P < 0.05). Error bars represent the standard deviation. *355MP. † 250MP. HSC, high-strength cohesive; Prog., progressive; TF, TruForm.

Article Snippet: The rank order from highest to lowest gel cohesivity was Allergan Natrelle 410 and Inspira implant containing TruForm 3 gel, followed by Mentor textured shaped implant containing Cohesive III gel, Sientra implant containing High-Strength Cohesive-Plus gel, and Motiva implant containing ProgressiveGel Plus.

Techniques: Standard Deviation

Mean shell thickness of breast implants. Statistical comparisons were made separately among textured (A) and smooth (B) implants. Textured shaped implants are Allergan Natrelle 410, Mentor Cohesive III, and Sientra High-Strength Cohesive Plus. Values that do not share a letter are significantly different ( P < 0.05). Error bars represent the standard deviation. HSC, high-strength cohesive; Prog., progressive; TF, TruForm.

Journal: Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Article Title: Physical Properties of Silicone Gel Breast Implants

doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy103

Figure Lengend Snippet: Mean shell thickness of breast implants. Statistical comparisons were made separately among textured (A) and smooth (B) implants. Textured shaped implants are Allergan Natrelle 410, Mentor Cohesive III, and Sientra High-Strength Cohesive Plus. Values that do not share a letter are significantly different ( P < 0.05). Error bars represent the standard deviation. HSC, high-strength cohesive; Prog., progressive; TF, TruForm.

Article Snippet: The rank order from highest to lowest gel cohesivity was Allergan Natrelle 410 and Inspira implant containing TruForm 3 gel, followed by Mentor textured shaped implant containing Cohesive III gel, Sientra implant containing High-Strength Cohesive-Plus gel, and Motiva implant containing ProgressiveGel Plus.

Techniques: Standard Deviation